Debate Questions?
amanda vx. tien nguyen
early 1980s’
amanda has parkinsons disease. and was fired from her job because of it, even though they said she was a better candiate. the job was the head runner of a biotech company.
question: is 10 years worth high quality research worth giving up for a person who has longevity?
it’s a debate against me and my classmates, they had the choice for fighting FOR amanda, and my group is fighting for the company. i have no idea what to say, and if you can help me. thank would be great, thanks
Tagged with: High Quality • Job • Quality Research
Filed under: Parkinsons
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!

amanda should stay in the company because she is being discriminated for a disease that wouldnt even show up right away, like any symptons, it will show up in the longrun (statistics) look at it this way parkinsons wont even show up for her, maybe 15 to 20 years later, so why would the 10 years matter now? amanda should be able to stay hands down, more expirience, better findings(=